Abercrombie & Fitch Co.: Settled and/or Concluded Case

• Proof Of Claim (32 KB)
  Deadline For Submission: February 26, 2007 Abercrombie & Fitch Securities Litigation c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Claims Administrator P.O. Box 9000 #6478 Merrick, NY 11566-9000 Toll Free: 1(866) 487-1709 ABF *P-ABF$F-POC/1* PROOF OF CLAIM CLAIMANT IDENTIFICATION: Claim Number: Control Number: IF THE ABOVE AREA IS BLANK, YOU MUST ENTER YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS HERE You must fill in the last four digits of your Social Security Number/ Taxpayer ID Number if box is blank: WRITE ANY NAME AND ADDRESS CORRECTIONS BELOW OR IF THERE IS NO PREPRINTED DATA TO THE LEFT, YOU MUST PROVIDE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS HERE: Name: Address: City: State/Country: Zip Code: Daytime Telephone Number: ( ) - Evening Telephone Number: ( ) - Email Address: Check appropriate box: D Individual ? Joint Owners ? Estate ? Corporation ? IRA ? Other________(Specify) IF YOU PURCHASED SHARES OF ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO. (“A&F”) COMMON STOCK BETWEEN OCTOBER 8, 1999 (AT A PRICE ON THAT DATE AT OR BE
  
  
• Notice Of Pendency Of Class Action And Proposed Settlement, Motion For Attorneys' Fees And Settlement Fairness Hearing (63 KB)
  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------ x : IN RE ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO. : MASTER FILE NO. M21-83 (TPG) SECURITIES LITIGATION : : ------------------------------------------------------------ x This document relates to all cases. ------------------------------------------------------------ x NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING If you purchased shares of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (“A&F”) common stock between October 8, 1999 (at a price on that date at or below $39.50) through and including October 13, 1999 (at a price on that date at or above $32.50), you may be a “Class Member” and you may be entitled to a payment from a class action settlement. A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. • A proposed settlement (the “Settlement”) will provide a $6,050,00
  
  

• Amended Order (56 KB)
  Case: 2:05-cv-00819-EAS -TPK Doc #: 416 Filed: 10/15/10 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 9449 No. 09-4028 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ROBERT ROSS, Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, THE CITY OF DEARBORN HEIGHTS ACT OF 345 POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, AMENDED ORDER Respondent-Appellee, ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO., DIANE CHANG, DAVID L. LEINO, LESLEE K. HERRO, MICHAEL S. JEFFRIES, ROBERT S. SINGER, Petitioners-App ellants. / Before: MARTIN and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges; and DUGGAN*, District Judge. Having been advised that a settlement has been reached in the district court, this appeal is DISMISSED. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Leonard Green, Clerk ^ *The Honorable Patrick J. Duggan, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation. Case: 2:05-cv-00819-EAS -TPK Doc #: 416 Filed: 10/15/10 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 9450 UNITED S
  
  
• Order Awarding Attorneys' Fees And Expenses To Lead And Liaison Counsel And Expenses To Lead Plaintiffs (105 KB)
  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ROBERT ROSS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Plaintiff, vs. ABERCROMBIE & FITCH COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 2:05-cv-00819-EAS-TPK (Consolidated) CLASS ACTION JUDGE EDMUND SARGUS, JR. MAGISTRATE JUDGE TERENCE KEMP ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES TO LEAD AND LIAISON COUNSEL AND EXPENSES TO LEAD PLAINTIFF 577014 I THIS MATTER came before the Court on September 24,2010, on the motion of Lead and Liaison Counsel for an award of attorneys' fees and expenses. The Court considered all papers filed and proceedings conducted in this case to date, and found the settlement to be fair, reasonable, and adequate. The Court GRANTS the motion for attorneys' fees and expenses and ORDERS: 1. All the capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement dated as of June 22,2010 and filed on June 30,2010 (the "Stipulation"). 2. Thi
  
  
• Order Approving Plan Of Allocation Of Settlement Proceeds (72 KB)
  Case: 2:05-cv-00819-EAS -TPK Doc #: 414 Filed: 09/24/10 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 9442 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ROBERT ROSS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Plaintiff, vs. ABERCROMBIE & FITCH COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 2:05-cv-00819-EAS-TPK (Consolidated) CLASS ACTION JUDGE EDMUND SARGUS, JR. MAGISTRATE JUDGE TERENCE KEMP ORDER APPROVING PLAN OF ALLOCATION OF SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS 576517 I Case: 2:05-cv-00819-EAS -TPK Doc #: 414 Filed: 09/24/10 Page: 2 of 3 PAGEID #: 9443 This matter having come before the Court on September 24,2010, on Lead Plaintiffs motion for approval of the Plan of Allocation of settlement proceeds in the above-captioned action; the Court having considered all papers filed and proceedings had herein; and otherwise being fully informed in the premises; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. For purposes of this Order, the terms used herein shall have the same meanings as set
  
  
• Final Judgment And Order Of Dismissal With Prejudice (277 KB)
  Case: 2:05-cv-00819-EAS -TPK Doc #: 413 Filed: 09/24/10 Page: 1 of 11 PAGEID #: 9431 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ROBERT ROSS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Plaintiff, vs. ABERCROMBIE & FITCH COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 2:05-cv-00819-EAS-TPK (Consolidated) CLASS ACTION JUDGE EDMUND SARGUS, JR. MAGISTRATE JUDGE TERENCE KEMP FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 576630 ] Case: 2:05-cv-00819-EAS -TPK Doc #: 413 Filed: 09/24/10 Page: 2 of 11 PAGEID #: 9432 This matter came before the Court for hearing pursuant to the Order of this Court, dated July 1,2010, on the application of the parties for approval of the settlement set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement dated as of June 22,2010 ("Stipulation"). Due and adequate notice having been given to the Class as required in said Order, and the Court having considered all papers filed and proceedings had herein and otherwise being fully informed in the premis
  
  
• Order Preliminarily Approving Settlement And Providing For Notice (1.30 MB)
  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ROBERT ROSS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Plaintiff, vs. ABERCROMBIE & FITCH COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 2:05-cv-00819-EAS-TPK (Consolidated) CLASS ACTION JUDGE EDMUND SARGUS, JR. MAGISTRATE JUDGE TERENCE KEMP ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE 570710_l 570710 1 WHEREAS, a consolidated class action is pending before the Court entitled Ross v. Abercrombie & Fitch Company, era/., No. 2:05-cv-00819-EAS-TPK (the "Litigation"); and WHEREAS, the Settling Parties took part in a one-day mediation conference with former United States District Judge Layn R. Phillips, and subsequently reached agreement on the material terms for settlement of the Litigation; and WHEREAS, the Court has received the Stipulation of Settlement dated as of June 22,2010 (the "Stipulation"), that has been entered into by the Lead Plaintiff and Defendants, and the Court has reviewed the Stipul
  
  
• Stipulation Of Settlement (1.30 MB)
  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ROBERT ROSS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Plaintiff, vs. ABERCROMBIE & FITCH COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 2:05-cv-00819-EAS-TPK (Consolidated) CLASS ACTION JUDGE EDMUND SARGUS, JR. MAGISTRATE JUDGE TERENCE KEMP STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT 525774 3 This Stipulation of Settlement dated as of June 22, 2010 (the "Stipulation"), is made and entered into by and among the following Settling Parties (as defined further in §IV, Ifl .20 hereof) to the above-entitled Litigation: (i) the Lead Plaintiff (on behalf of itself and each of the Class Members), by and through its counsel of record in the Litigation; and (ii) the Defendants, by and through their counsel of record in the Litigation. This Stipulation is intended by the Settling Parties to fully, finally and forever resolve, discharge and settle the Released Claims (as defined below), upon and subject to the terms and conditions hereof. I. T
  
  
• Joint Notice Of Appeal (59 KB)
  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO THE BOOTH FAMILY TRUST and ) ALFRED FREED, ) Case Nos. C2-05-819 ) C2-05-964 Plaintiffs, ) C2-05-998 ) C2-05-1084 v. ) MICHAEL S. JEFFRIES, ROBERT S. ) SINGER, JAMES B. BACHMANN, ) LAUREN J. BRISKY, JOHN W. ) KESSLER, JOHN A. GOLDEN, ) EDWARD F. LIMATO, RUSSELL M. ) GERTMENIAN, ARCHIE M. GRIFFIN, ) ALLAN A. TUTTLE, and SAMUEL N. ) SHAHID, JR., ) Defendants, ) and ) ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO. ) Nominal Defendant. ) JOINT NOTICE OF APPEAL Notice is hereby given that plaintiffs The Booth Family Trust and
  
  
• Order (32 KB)
  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION IN RE ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION Case No. 2:05-cv-008I9 (Lead Case) Case No. 2:05-cv-00860 Case No. 2:05-cv-00964 Case No. 2:05-cv-00998 Case No. 2:05-cv-01084 Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. Magistrate Judge Kemp ORDER The Civil Judgment entered in Case No. 05-819 on March 12, 2009 (doc. 312) relates only to the consolidated shareholder derivative matters. The Clerk is directed to enter Final Judgment in the following case numbers: Case No. 2:05-cv-00860 Case No. 2:05-cv-00964 Case No. 2:05-cv-00998 CaseNo.2:05-cv-01084 Case No. 05-819 remains open as the Lead Case for the pending, consolidated securities class action matters (Case Nos. 05-819, 05-848, 05-879, 05-893, 05-913, 05-959). IT IS SO ORDERED. Date Edmui Sargus, Jr. UnitecTStates District Judge
  
  
• Opinion And Order (0.77 MB)
  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION IN RE ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION Case No. 2:05-cv-008I9 Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. Magistrate Judge Kemp OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on nominal Defendant Abercrombie & Fitch Co.'s Motion to Dismiss this consolidated shareholder derivative suit. (Doc. 120). For the reasons that follow, the motion is GRANTED, and the derivative action is DISMISSED. I. Plaintiffs in this consolidated shareholder derivative action bring suit on behalf of and against nominal defendant Abercrombie, alleging that certain members of Abercrombie's Board of Directors made false and misleading public statements, engaged in or sanctioned insider trading, and mismanaged the Company by maintaining or endorsing discriminatory employment practices.1 The consolidated Derivative Complaint (doc. 60), filed July 10, 2006. contains six causes of action: (1) Against the Insider Selling Defendants for Breach of Fiduciar