DIRECTV, Inc. Class Action: Filed Case

• Class Action Complaint (91 KB)
  BEATIE AND OSBORN LLP Daniel A. Osborn (132472) Russel H. Beatie Eduard Korsinsky 521 Fifth Avenue 34th Floor New York, New York 10175 (212) 888-9000 Todd C. Bank, Esq. 119-40 Union Turnpike Fourth Floor Kew Gardens, New York 11415 (718) 520-7125 Attorneys for Plaintiff and All Others Similarly Situated SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY --------------------------------------------------------------- X HAROLD B. BONIME, on behalf of himself and : all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. DIRECTV, INC. and PRIME TV, LLC, Defendant. Civil No. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT - X Plaintiff, by and through its attorneys, Beatie and Osborn LLP, alleges as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. Plaintiff Harold B. Bonime is a certified public accountant with an office in the City and State of New York. Plaintiff Bonime maintains and operates a facsimile machine. 2. Defendant DIRECTV, Inc. ("DIRECTV"), is a California corporation with its principle place of bus
  
  

• Class Action Complaint (1.39 MB)
  FIRST LEGAL SUPPORT-LA CONTROL# -----------CUSTOMER NAME----------- CUST# 4188161 FIRST LEGAL SUPPORT SERVICES-SF 1002 09/17/08 FAX/PDF-FILING 9:37 -------PICKUP INFO---------- FIRST LEGAL SUPPORT SERVICES 1511 W BEVERLY BOULEVARD LOS ANGELES 213 250-9111 CA 90026 Wait: 21 Caller: Mildred De La Ro Sig: filed Time: 11:15 Date: 9/17/08 Reference: 6443270 ----------DELIVERY INFO--- LASC-LOS ANGELES 111 NORTH HILL STREET DEPTS 1-86 LOS ANGELES CA 90012 213 974-5248 new complaint FILE/CONFORM/RETURN RETURN TO FELIX FOR SERVICE civil cover sheet summons.addendum Total: SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES k NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT - UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE Case Number. THIS FORM IS TO BE SERVED WITH THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Your case is assigned for all purposes to the judicial officer indicated below. There is additional information on the reverse side of this form. ASSIGNED JUDGI; DEPT ROOM | ASSIGNED JUDGE DEPT ROOM Hon. Gregory Alarcon 36
  
  
• Class Action Complaint (0.76 MB)
  Case 1:08-cv-02850-SO Document 1 Filed 12/04/2008 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION DOLORES STACHURSKI and BOB ) Case No. KRAVOS, JR., on behalf of themselves ) and all others similarly situated, ) Judge Plaintiffs, ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT vs. ) DIRECTV, INC., a California corporation, ) ) JURY DEMANDED Defendant. ) 1. Plaintiffs, by and through counsel, bring this Complaint on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, to obtain actual, statutory, and punitive damages, restitution, declaratory and/or injunctive relief, as well as costs of suit and reasonable attorneys' fees from the Defendant. Plaintiffs state and allege as follows: PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 2. Plaintiffs bring this consumer class action against DirecTV, Inc., a leading provider of satell
  
  
• Class Action Complaint (1.74 MB)
  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON -15" 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Keith and Jana Harper, husband and wife, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated in the State of Washington Plaintiffs, NO. vs. DIRECTV, INC., a California Corporation. Defendant. .FILED .LODGED .ENTERED .RECEIVED MAR 04 2009 AT SEATTLE CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON BY DEPUTY C09-0282 *¦* COMPLAINT CLASS ACTION (1) Penalty Clause in Contract; (2) Unjust Enrichment; (3) Washington Consumer Protection ActTRCWT9.8670lD etseq.; (4) California Consumer Remedies Act, Cal.Civ. Code Section 1750 et seq. (5) California Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. And Prof. Code Section 17200 and 17500 (6) Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201 AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiffs Keith and Jana Harper, for their Complaint against Defendan
  
  
• Plaintiff's Class Action Petition (1.22 MB)
  FI! FD ~*^7=T7^i IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR CANADIAN COUNTER e rams^y c5uRTclerk STATE OF OKLAHOMA feNAO,AN COUNTY' OKfc^ ERIK KENDALL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. DIRECTV, INC., a For Profit Corporation with Major Operations in Oklahoma; and, DOES 1-100, inclusively, Defendants. MAR 0 5 2003 BY... . " ~..........''"Z'^S DEPUTY. CaseNo,d5'5lOC^^O^ CASE ASSIGNED TO; SDWAKD C. CUNNINGHAM JUDGE: PLAINTIFF'S CLASS ACTION PETITION COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Erik Kendall, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and for their causes of action would allege and state as follows: INTRODUCTION 1. Plaintiff brings this consumer Class action against DIRECTV, Inc., a For Profit Corporation with Major Operations in Oklahoma and Does 1-100 (collectively "DIRECTV") a leading provider of satellite television services in Oklahoma. DIRECTV engages in a uniform policy and prac
  
  
• Complaint (439 KB)
  o IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FRK,e nconc NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA r" ATLANTA DIVISION U.S.D.C. Atlanta RENATO CAPPUCCITTI, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. DIRECTV, INC., a California Corporation, Defendant. MAR 0 6 2009 JAM Civil Action N° CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 1. Plaintiff Renato Cappuccitti, by counsel, alleges upon knowledge and with respect to himself and his own acts and upon information belief based, in part, on the investigation of counsel and publicly available reports and statements, as to all other matters as follows: NATURE OF THE CASE 2. DIRECTV engages in the unlawful practice of using early cancellation penalties to extract improper penalties from its customers and/or wrongfully deter them from seeking 1 alternative satellite service providers. The penalty (which ranges from $175 to $480) constitutes an unlawful penalty, and the manner in which it is typically collected—by an automatic debit of a cus